Blog
L&D & Training
November 12, 2026

Rethinking Your L&D Tech Stack

Learning and Development EvangelistΒ at Synthesia

The last time you had a question at work, what did you do? Did you ask an LLM connected to your intranet? Go to YouTube or Google? Phone a friend? Whatever you did, I’d bet you didn’t go to your Learning Management System (LMS).

That’s a problem, especially when it’s often a significant line item in a learning and development budget. And it may be why, in our 2026 survey of learning professionals, only 47% expected the LMS to remain the backbone of their tech stack in three years.

The LMS may serve an important purpose, such as tracking and reporting for compliance, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you should build your tech stack around it. There may be more cost-effective and efficient ways to design, deliver, and measure your training.

L&D’s greatest opportunity with its tech stack is to find ways to work better within systems that employees are already using. So if you’re rethinking your tech stack, factor in employee behavior: where they go to get answers, learn new things, or even practice skills.Β 

But first, you need a clear picture of what your stack includes.

What’s really in your L&D tech stack

A tech stack is the collection of tools and systems your organization uses. But it also refers to how data flows (or doesn’t), and how employees use them.Β 

When I talk about an L&D β€œtech stack,” I’m referring to the ecosystem across an organization where people share and apply knowledge.

This includes tools and systems for:

  • Content management and delivery
    The usual suspects: LMSs and Learning Experience Platforms (LXP)
  • Content creation
    Things like eLearning authoring tools or AI video platforms
  • Practice and coaching
    Roleplay, simulation, and coaching tools where people build skills and get real-time feedback
  • Third-party content and programs
    You know, the massive subscription libraries or cohort-based learning platforms
  • Work systems
    Everything from AI tools to survey and feedback platforms, intranets, shared workspaces, and videoconferencing

Learning shows up across all of these in an organization. That’s what makes the tech stack harder to think about: it’s how all of these systems work together. Mapping this ecosystem is only the first step. You need to know what you have, how people use it, and where they don’t. Where the systems are disconnected.

How to assess your tech stack

It might seem counterintuitive, but to assess your tech stack, I want you to go talk to anyone who can explain how knowledge transfer is happening on a daily basis. You need this context to answer the following questions about every tool and system in your stack:

  1. How is it being used?
    Follow-ups: Why is it being used? How often?
  2. How hard is it to use?
    Follow-ups: How many steps does it take to get what you need? Where do people drop off? What workarounds have appeared?
  3. What value are you driving from it?
    Follow-ups: What does it cost to run? What problem is it solving? If you removed it, what would actually break?

You're evaluating the use, friction, and value. Three things that will help you make a data-informed decision.

Why friction hurts learner engagement

The last time I had to build a tech stack, I learned about friction the hard way. Friction is any extra step between an employee and a learning experience, whether that's an additional login or unclear navigation. The more friction a system introduces, the less likely an employee will engage with the learning.

I contracted with a third-party vendor to deliver what seemed like an exceptional cohort-based experience, and the content was strong. But the platform was basically its own LMS, with a separate login, calendaring, messaging, and more. People hated it. Even those who had asked for the content wouldn't engage with it, and over half of the registered attendees dropped out before the second session.

Never underestimate the user experience's impact on engagement.

Decide what stays, what changes, and what goes

You've done the assessment, and now it's time to make some tough calls. Here's how I think about it:

  1. Keep it if it's working.Β 
  2. Repurpose it when it still has value, just not in the current use case.
  3. Remove it when the cost and complexity outweigh the benefits.

A few caveats.

First, it is rarely simple to remove an enterprise tool or system. It usually involves canceling a contract or giving notice, either of which may carry financial penalties. Plus there’s the change to manage. Before moving forward with a decision, speak to your procurement team and brainstorm any downstream impacts of removal: from migrating content to notifying teams and training them on new tools.

Second, if you’re considering replacing a tool (notice how I didn’t list that as an option), ask yourself whether you need a tool at all to accomplish your goal. If your LMS isn’t driving value, consider whether replacing it with a new LMS is going to solve that problem.

The tool is probably not the root cause.

Example: An LMS

In this scenario, you work at a company with 3,500 employees globally. You've had your LMS for over 4 years, and the contract is up for renewal. You need to decide what stays, what changes, and what goes. Here's what you find when you assess its use, friction, and value:

Use

  • Monthly active users: 28%
  • Repeat monthly usage: 12%
  • Course completion: 64% (compliance-related), 18% (optional training)
  • From your conversations: employees only go inside the LMS when they're assigned required learning or when their manager reminds them they have compliance training; they rely on an AI assistant built into their messaging, docs, and workspace tools for answers
  • Less than 5% of employees ever use the AI-powered search feature

Friction

  • Separate login required (not SSO)
  • After onboarding, there are high drop-off rates
  • It integrates only with the HRIS and no other systems
  • Frequent support tickets related to access and usability

Value

  • License: $120,000/year
  • Integrations and support: ~$40,000/year
  • Admin overhead: ~1 FTE
  • Strong for compliance tracking

The data suggests the system serves an important function, tracking compliance, but it is not where employees go to learn.

Decision

  • Keep the LMS as the compliance system of record. It does that job well, with 64% completion on mandated training.
  • Repurpose the optional learning. Only 18% of it gets completed inside the LMS, so move the content worth keeping to where people already look for answers: short guides and videos in their workspace tools, where the AI assistant can surface them.
  • Hold off on removing it. Ask the vendor about fixing the friction, like the lack of SSO and the single HRIS integration, at renewal. A new LMS would not change where employees go for answers, and switching means migrating content and retraining admins and employees. Before renewal, ask procurement what a compliance-only scope would cost.

What AI is revealing about your tech stack

Every day, I hear about a new AI tool (I only wish that was an exaggeration), and I work at an AI company. Meanwhile, your employees are already using AI at work.

The question for your tech stack is whether anything you add connects to how they already get answers.

What the research says about AI and learning
  • 74% of frontline employees use AI regularly. (BCG, 2026)
  • 49% of employees using AI at work use it for search or research. (Gallup, 2026)
  • Just 51% of workers say they have access to the learning and development resources they need, down from 59% a year earlier. (PwC, 2026)

L&D decision-makers are being overwhelmed with AI tools, many of which promise to solve problems we didn’t know we had. Teams are scrambling to work with procurement to vet them, either as replacements or additions to the stack.

The excitement makes sense, since formats like SCORM have constrained us for years. But before you add anything, ask how it connects to the systems your employees already use.

Two mistakes to avoid with AI tools

1. Expecting a tool to fix measurement

If you're struggling to measure training, an AI tool isn't going to fix that for you. Teams are creating content faster but struggling to catch up with measurement. In our 2027 report, 72% of respondents who answered our impact questions consistently measure participation and completions, but only 35% consistently measure on-the-job performance.

2. Trusting AI features bolted onto old products

A lot of what's being marketed as AI is SaaS vendors bolting new features onto old products without fixing the underlying issues in the product (or in your learning). Give the AI features in tools you already own the same scrutiny as anything new.

What to do with the capacity you create

AI can free up capacity, and so can repurposing or removing something from your tech stack. The question is what to do with that time or money. This is where most teams default to adding something new. Instead, focus on how you could take something you’ve already created and deliver it better. How can you reduce the friction between the employee and the learning experience?

You’re competing with AI for attention. So here’s what you’re going to do about it. Take one piece of content and make it as easy as possible for someone to access when they need it.

Here are five examples of how to do that:

Where people get stuck Why it happens Where to meet them
Writing an onboarding plan Managers don't know what to include or what good looks like In your knowledge hub, where it can be found through search or surfaced by an AI assistant (an intranet or internal wiki)
Completing performance reviews Employees need to submit their self-reviews but don't know where to go A pinned video demonstration walking them through the tool, embedded where they're already working
Expensing professional development funds People message a colleague or manager instead of searching the policy An AI assistant in Slack or Teams that searches the policy and answers directly, so the right information reaches them where they already are
Revisiting objection handling training before a call Training lives in the LMS, not where they're preparing A short refresher embedded in the CRM record or calendar invite, surfaced at the moment they need it
Operating unfamiliar equipment safely Safety documentation exists but is stored in a separate system they'd have to leave the floor to access A QR code on the equipment linking to a short video walkthrough they can watch on their phone before they start

The bottom line

Your employees are learning, with or without your L&D tech stack. Whatever decisions you make about tools or systems come down to two questions: can employees get what they need where they already work, and how will you know?

You can calculate the per-employee cost of an LMS license, but can you show that a course completion inside the platform led to behavioral change tied to business impact? That’s the harder question, and the more important one.

If you’re accountable for the L&D budget, you have to justify the investments you’re making. Be sure to connect those decisions to your strategy.

Amy Vidor

Amy Vidor, PhD, is the Learning and Development Evangelist at Synthesia, where she researches learning trends and helps organizations apply AI at scale. With 15 years of experience, she has advised companies, governments, and universities on skills.

Go to author's profile

Frequently asked questions

What is an L&D tech stack?

An L&D tech stack is the collection of tools and systems an organization uses to share and apply knowledge, along with how data flows between them and how employees use them. It includes systems for content management and delivery (like LMSs and LXPs), content creation, practice and coaching, third-party content, and everyday work tools like AI assistants, intranets, and shared workspaces.Β 

What’s the difference between an LMS and an LXP?

A learning management system (LMS) is software for administering, delivering, and tracking training, such as assigning courses and reporting on completions. It’s traditionally been how workplace teams deliver and track eLearning, which is why many organizations still rely on it for compliance.Β 

A learning experience platform (LXP) is focused on the learning experience itself, such as helping employees discover content and get personalized recommendations. Today, the lines between the two are blurring.

Video template title
Video template
Create video from template